Friday, October 7, 2016

When Genius Failed (Chapter 8)

Chapter 8
“The Fall”

The chapter begins with Russia declaring debt moratorium on August 17th. The government basically decided to pay its own workers rather than paying debt holders in the US. Several days after this, the rest of the world started to feel its effects, turning investors to a panic and them running from any sort of investment risk wherever it was. Swap spreads began to rise sharply, and the surge in volatility cost Long Term tens of millions of dollars. People were buying safe, low-yielding bonds and selling risky, high-yielding bonds, and this pushed the spreads between these bonds even wider.

Swap spreads reached records ranges, widening to ranges like 76 in May. The models Long Term were using assumed this could only happen once like in 1987, but it was happening again. Because of Long Term’s level of leverage, it was losing money wherever it looked. Nothing was going right, as even Long Term’s safer bonds in Russia and Brazil were down. Long Term had calculated with great mathematical certainty that it would not lose more than $35 million on any single day, however it had just dropped $553 million, 15% of its capital, on one day. In less than three months, it had lost a third of its total capital.

Because of all these losses, Long Term’s leverage was dangerously high. To reduce the risk, the partners had to sell something, and now the question was what that something would be. Meriwether reached out to George Soros to talk strategy. Soros agreed to invest $500 million at the end of August if Long Term could raise an additional $500 million in time. Long Term also turned to JP Morgan about strategies to salvage some of Long Term’s positions. Mendoza, the Morgan vice chairman, offered another $200 million.

Something the models Long Term had been using had missed was the liquidity in the credit markets. With everyone trying to get out at the same time, there was no liquidity. Because of Long Term’s extreme leverage, it was forced to sell. However, without buyers, prices run to the extremes beyond the bell curve.

With few days to come up with the remaining $300 million to match Soros’ investment, the partners persistently tried to meet with Buffett who persistently declined to invest in Long Term. Aside from the fund, the partners realized another problem was on their hands; LTCM’s cash flow. The management company owed $165 million to a group of banks, and when they heard of the fund’s poor performance, they thought they were entitled to demand repayment. The management company didn’t have the cash, and was close to being insolvent. If this became public, the firm and the fund would face a lot of trouble.

The Long Term fund was also facing cash flow troubles. Bear Stearns, the funds clearing broker, never signed an agreement so could stop clearing trades whenever he pleased. Long Term was now at the mercy of Bear.

By the end of August, the fund came up short to meet Soros’ investment, and was left with only $2.28 billion after losing 45% of its capital. The month experienced a kind of volatility that mathematicians thought was unlikely to occur in the life of the Universe. Every bet for Long Term was losing simultaneously and the fund was in terrible shape.

Questions
Ch. 8
-       -How were Meriwether and Soros different in strategizing?
-       -In August, how did banks respond to their clients’ mounting losses when bond trading all but vanished? What did the flow of capital look like in this time?
-       -What was unique about Vinny Mattone, the fund’s first contact at Bear Stearns, and the way he saw the markets?
-       -What was the relationship in this period between the fund and banks?
-       -How was this crash referenced in media outlets and news?

-       -How did the month of August end for the fund and for the bond market as a whole?

Discussion Post - When Genius Failed (Chapter 7)

In 1998, Long Term began to short equity volatility. This idea, referred to as “equity vol”, comes from the Black-Scholes model. This model and the theory behind it assumes the volatility of stocks is consistent over time. This economic model along with many others told firms equity vol was being mispriced, and the firms began to bet against it.

An equity vol isn’t an explicit stock or security, but there is an indirect way to bet on it. Lowenstein describes betting on the volatility of the market as an analogy of betting on the weather in Florida. The price of orange juice fluctuates according to the odds of a frost occurring, so one can infer high orange juice prices may represent the market is expecting a frost and a shortage of oranges. Similarly, Long Term deduced the stock market was expecting volatility at 20% when it was really closer to 15%. Assuming option prices would sooner or later fall, Long Term then began to short options on the S&P 500 index, calling it “selling volatility”. This was considered to be very risky, as volatility is not easily predictable, fluctuates on a daily basis, there is a small market for selling volatility, and international markets too play a role in volatility.

1998 started off well, Long Term’s leverage was up, and even though the partners took out huge personal loans, their exposure seemed to be appropriate. Partners at Long Term weren’t anxious of losing, they were anxious about finding enough investments to win. Long Term began to make more directional bets instead of their landmark hedging strategy. However, partners at Long Term began to lose patience in researching and analyzing trades and there began internal conflict within the partnership; tensions which Wall Street knew nothing about. Banks and other firms soon began to cut back on less liquid bonds, which were the kind of bonds Long Term’s portfolio consisted of. A Salomon trader in London noted that “as people liquidated, volatility moved up. That forced more people to liquidate.”

Soon the US economy as a whole began to slow. Yields on Treasuries fell to 6.7%. Russia’s financial system was on the verge of collapse. The IMF bailout in Indonesia also ran into some difficulties. The Swiss bank was also completely exposed as it was Long Term’s largest investor.

Things continued to look down, as Long Term began losing money in every market it was a part of. The stock market was suddenly very volatile, and option prices jumped. Implied volatility rose to 27%, creating a substantial loss for Long Term as it had shorted equity vol at far lower levels. In June, Long Term experienced its worst month ever, losing 10%.

In April of 1998, the swap spread in the US was 48 basis points. This is the difference between the LIBOR and the Treasury yield. Long Term however, had bet this spread would narrow as Long Term saw no recession on the horizon.

In July, Salomon announced its exit from US arbitrage, declaring “Opportunity for arbitrage profits has lessened over time while the risks and volatility have grown.” Long Term partners underestimated the seriousness of the net largest player in their business quitting.


In August, The US was affected by the crisis in Russia even after its IMF bailout, weakness in Asia, Iraq’s refusal to permit weapon inspections, the possibility of China’s currency devaluing, and presidential tumult. Thirty-year bond yields hit another all-time low, reaching 5.56%, and credit spreads kept widening. Long Term was losing money in August, for the third month of four. Long Term partners were optimistic, thinking the spread would have to eventually narrow. Long Term decided to jump more into Russia, where it already owned both hedged and unhedged bonds. Even though it was against Long Term’s way, it went long into Russia, which was now the spectacle of the entire world.

Questions
-       What is the relationship noted about liquidation and volatility?
-       What did it mean to bet on volatility?
-       What was the risk associated with arbitrage?
-       How did the strategy and mind set of Long Term change throughout the chapter?
-       What did the fall in Treasury yield indicate?

Wednesday, May 11, 2016

Dynamic Pricing

Did the price of my favorite drink just increase? Companies across the country are using technology to track consumer behavior and changing prices.

Here is a fun article talking about how bars, airlines, toll roads, and even Disneyland use dynamic pricing. The idea is simple, charge you more when the demand for a particular product is high.

Sunday, November 8, 2015

U.S. Unemployment across Counties

GeoFRED


Unemployment Across the U.S.

GeoFRED

Federal Reserve Treasury Holding

FRED codes: TREAS15, TREAS1590, TREAS911Y, TREAS1T5, TREAS5T10, TREAS10Y


Federal Reserve Balance Sheet

FRED codes: WRESCRT, WSECOUT, TREAST, WMBSSEC, WFEDSEC


Inflation Output Loops (1960-1983)

FRED codes: PCEPI, GDPCI, GDPPOT


Beveridge Curve

FRED codes: UNRATE, JTSJOR


Monetary Policy Rules

FRED codes: UNRATE, PCEPILFE,  PCEPI, GDPCI, GDPPOT

Mankiw Rule: i = 8.5 + 1.4(inflation - unemployment rate)

Taylor Rule: i = 2 + inflation + 0.5(inflation - 2) + 0.5(output gap)


Phillip's Curve

FRED codes: UNRATE, PCEPI


Okun's Law

FRED codes: GDPPOT GDPC1 UNRATE

Monday, August 3, 2015

A Film about Inequality

Normally in class I would spend a considerable time talking about economic inequality. This is a bit harder to do online. Here are two interesting videos on economic inequality.




Ep. 20: MONKEY BUSINESS | Shola Lynch from We The Economy on Vimeo.

Wednesday, July 29, 2015

When will the Federal Reserve raise interest rates?

Short-term interest rates have been hovering around zero for nearly 7 years. Many believe they will raise rates toward the end of the summer. How does this rate impact the average college student? Could mean slight higher rates on student loans but also on checking/saving accounts.